Scroll.inIndia· English
SC says it never heard matters related to modification of Form 6
Reported by 8 outlets from 1 country, in 2 languages, between 12 Oct 2026 and 13 Oct 2026.
Key points
Key facts
The Supreme Court clarified that it has neither approved nor rejected the changes to Form 6 used during the special intensive revision. This clarification addresses the Election Commission's claim that the Court upheld a declaration attached to Form 6 for the revision. Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge filed a petition in the Supreme Court regarding the revision process.
Summary written automatically by an artificial intelligence model installed on our servers, from the outlets' headlines, then checked by automatic rules. It may contain errors: the sources' headlines prevail.
- SC says it never heard matters related to modification of Form 6 Headline of the event's most representative article · Scroll.in, 12 Oct 2026
- Where it happened: India. See on the map
- Reported by 8 outlets from 1 country, in 2 languages, between 12 Oct 2026 and 13 Oct 2026.8 articles · See all headlines
Key points built automatically from headlines and coverage data, without generative artificial intelligence. echoblic copies no article text.
Go to the sources
बिज़नेस स्टैंडर्ड हिंदीIndia· Hindi
नए फॉर्म 6 पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट की कोई राय नहीं, न मंजूरी दी और न ही खारिज किया निर्वाचन आयोग का फैसला
The Times of IndiaIndia· English
Not ruled on Form 6 yet, neither approved nor disapproved it: SC
द वायर हिंदीIndia· Hindi
एसआईआर: सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने कहा- नए फॉर्म-6 को न स्वीकृत किया, न अस्वीकृत
Original headlines, attributed to their outlets and reproduced as published.
Locate · connect · understand
Places and sources on the map
Where the event took place
Where it happened
Where it happened and where the outlets are based are two different pieces of information.
Where do the outlets publish?
Diamond: where the event took place; light square: another place involved, joined by a line. Grey circles: number of outlets published in each country that cover the event; they do not show that country's opinion. No borders are drawn. Basemap © OpenStreetMap contributors, OpenFreeMap.
Follow the story
Coverage timeline
- First article seen: “सुप्रीम कोर्ट बोला- फॉर्म-6 पर हमने कोई फैसला नहीं दिया:न हमारे सामने आया, न मंजूर किया ना ही नामंजूर किया; बिहार SIR पर सुनवाई”
- 2 new outlets, including “Not ruled on Form 6 yet, neither approved nor disapproved it: SC”
Check · compare · dig deeper
Every source, clearly
The original headlines, their outlet, its country and language. Direct access to what was published.
8 outlets · 8 articles
Hindustan TimesIndia· English
‘Do not put words in our mouth’: Supreme Court says it never adjudicated new Form 6, will examine challenge on Oct 27
टीवी9 भारतवर्षIndia· Hindi
फॉर्म-6 में बदलाव से वोटर लिस्ट तक… SIR पर राहुल और खरगे की सुप्रीम कोर्ट में याचिका में क्या-क्या
दैनिक भास्करIndia· Hindi
सुप्रीम कोर्ट बोला- फॉर्म-6 पर हमने कोई फैसला नहीं दिया:न हमारे सामने आया, न मंजूर किया ना ही नामंजूर किया; बिहार SIR पर सुनवाई
प्रभात खबरIndia· Hindi
जस्टिस बागची बोले- सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने Form-6 में बदलावों को न मंजूरी दी, न खारिज किया
बिज़नेस स्टैंडर्ड हिंदीIndia· Hindi
नए फॉर्म 6 पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट की कोई राय नहीं, न मंजूरी दी और न ही खारिज किया निर्वाचन आयोग का फैसला
Method
Articles about the same fact are automatically grouped into one event, in every language. Each outlet counts once, whatever its number of articles. The country, owner and reputation of an outlet are never used. Analysis no. 76 of , engine 0.1.0.